Albert Namtjira was the first Australian Aboriginal to be recognised nationally and internationally as an artist. He is best known for his landscape paintings which he painted using watercolours in a western style. He painted the country that he lived in, that he was part of, the land of the Arrernte (Aranda) people in the Western Macdonell Ranges area of the Northern Territory.

Albert lived from 1902-1959. He was born near the site of the Herrmansburg Lutheran Mission near Alice Springs. He was named Elea by his parents but while he was still a young boy his family moved to the mission where he was baptised and given the Christian name Albert. After receiving a western style upbringing on the mission, he returned to the bush at the age of 13 where he was initiated and learnt the traditional ways of his people. This exposure to his culture inspired the love and respect for his country that he would later show to the world through his art. At the age of 18 he married Ilkalita, a girl from a neighbouring tribe. He spent several years supporting his growing family by doing odd jobs and spent some time as a camel driver which allowed him to see more of central Australia. After returning to the mission, his wife was baptised as Rubena.

In 1934 Albert was introduced to western painting by two artists who exhibited at the mission. When one of these artists returned two years later to paint, Albert acted as his guide in return for lessons in watercolour painting. These two months were the only art tuition he was to receive. He excelled and quickly developed his own painting style. His landscape paintings were rich in the colours of the native bush and illustrated the rugged terrain of his home lands.

His first exhibition in Melbourne in 1938 consisted of 41 paintings and was quickly sold out. Subsequent exhibitions in Adelaide and Sydney were equally successful. Albert was soon to become a celebrity, even noting Queen Elizabeth II among his fans. Even though he appeared to enjoy the fame, Albert was not comfortable with big city life, and always enjoyed returning home to his land and family.

Despite his success, Albert preferred the simple life. Sharing what he earned with all of his family in the traditional way. When he wanted to lease a cattle farm for his family, he was prevented by the laws that existed at the time because he was an Aborigine. He tried to build a house in Alice Springs but again he was prevented by the law. It was a ridiculous situation for Albert. He was famous, but because he was an Aborigine he was not recognised as a citizen and was prevented from owning land.

Public outcry over Albert’s situation forced the government to grant him citizenship in 1957. It was 10 years later before the rest of Australia’s Aboriginal population would be granted the same rights.This meant that Albert would now be able to own land, would be able to vote, would be able to enter a hotel and be allowed to buy alcohol.

Unfortunately the restrictions that remained for other Aboriginal people resulted in Albert’s demise. Because of his traditional family values, Albert shared all he had with his family. This resulted in him breaking the white man’s law. He was found guilty of supplying alcohol to Aboriginals. In 1958 he was convicted and served 2 months imprisonment. His conviction and time in jail broke his spirit. He lost his interest in painting and in life. Albert died as a result of heart disease in 1959.

Share
 

Time for a little history lesson. This is part of Australian history that is rarely (if at all) taught in schools. Unless you are a local of the Gundagai area in New South Wales, you’ve probably never even heard of Yarri. During the major floods in the year 1852, dozens of settlers from the Gundagai town were saved by two Wiradjuri men in simple bark canoes. Yarri, who was later joined by Jacky Jacky, over two days, paddled their canoes back and forth along the swollen Murrumbidgee river looking for surviviors.

In the early days of the Gundagai settlement, the local aboriginal people tried to warn the European settlers of the danger of building on the plain near to the river. The settlers ignored the warning. When the floods eventually happened, it was the Wiradjuri people that came to their rescue.

Today the flood plain is now named after Yarri, and there are a number of monuments to honour him within the town of Gundagai, which was later rebuilt on higher ground. You can read the whole story here Yarri – A Frontier Story

Share
 

These words are not my own, but I do agree wholeheartedly with them.

** This article may contain the names and images of deceased people. **

Who could have anticipated that segue in Brendan Nelson’s apology speech from compensation to the “ultimate sacrifice” of Australian soldiers who “put responsibilities to the nation before their rights”?

Remember that his audience in the House of Representatives included survivors of times when Aboriginal people had no rights at all, not even the sacred right to remain together as a family. It would have been appropriate to pause to remember the men and women who sacrificed so much to achieve these rights and who started our nation on the long journey to this historic occasion.

Of course nations are notoriously selective in what they remember and celebrate. Powerful stakeholders boost their own myths of nationhood. The public celebrates events that reinforce a positive image; ignoble acts are silenced and forgotten.

But even a nation’s foundational myths can shift with the times. Histories from the margins chip away at cherished narratives and leaders are inspired by new visions of nationhood. Events and people are remembered and forgotten in the changing seasons of national memories.

Our nation has a long history of remembering and forgetting the Stolen Generations. We remembered them in the 1990s when the nation was rocked by disclosures in the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody, Paul Keating’s Redfern Speech, the Going Home Conference in Darwin, the Kruger case, the National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children, the Bringing Them Home Report and the Gunner Cubillo case. Then, after a sustained period of often-vicious debate, the issue suddenly disappeared from the headlines, only to be revived in 2008 by the Rudd Government’s Statement of Apology.

This cycle of remembering and forgetting happened down the years. Who remembers the nation’s shocked reaction 50 years ago to West Australian parliamentarian Bill Grayden’s film footage of diseased and starving children at Warburton Mission and his allegations that government plans for their mass evacuation contravened the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights?

What of the horrific report in 1968 by Reg Worthy, Director of the Department of Aboriginal Affairs in Victoria, on the ‘trafficking’ of Aboriginal children in Melbourne and the finding that over 300 had been ‘”illegally adopted” into white families?

During the 1970s a new Aboriginal leadership put their stamp on the issue, but who remembers this? In 1974 the nation was divided by sensational media reports condemning or praising the actions of Bill Ryan, Director of Northern Territory Aboriginal Legal Aid, who rejected government directives and returned an Aboriginal girl to her parents after she was kept in foster-care for eight years without just cause.

A heated national debate on the fostering of Aboriginal children erupted and culminated in calls from the National Aboriginal Consultative Council for a federal inquiry. Bill Ryan told his own tragic story of removal to the press and called for a Royal Commission into the “dangerously cruel” practice. Gordon Bryant, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs in the Whitlam government, announced that he would appoint an inquiry into foster placements in the Territory and that the children would be returned to their families. Shortly after he was removed from office, reportedly because of his handling of the Darwin case.

What do we remember of the struggle for practical strategies and resources to restore rights to Aboriginal families? A leading force here was Molly Dyer, daughter of Margaret Tucker whose autobiography If Everyone Cared remains a classic account of removal.

Working for the Aboriginal Legal Service in Melbourne in the 1970s, Dyer noted the link between Aboriginal child removal and imprisonment and the high rate of breakdowns of adoptions and foster placements.

She fought successfully for the development of an Aboriginal Child Placement Principle based on Aboriginal values and practices and a national network of Aboriginal Child Care Agencies to deliver professional Aboriginal foster care and link-up services. Dyer also built networks of exchange with indigenous groups overseas. Adding fuel to her campaign were international debates on the Convention of the Right of the Child adopted in the United Nations in 1978 and celebrations for the 1979 International Year of the Child.

In 1981 Brian Butler became the public face and driving force behind the new Secretariat of National Aboriginal and Islander Child Care. Criss-crossing the country, he lobbied relentlessly for federal control of services for Aboriginal children and families, claiming that the 1967 referendum made this a moral and legal obligation.

A new generation of leaders led the national campaigns of the 1990s, and many of them were in Parliament for the Apology.

But the decades of sacrifice had taken a heavy toll on their elders. Of those mentioned here only Brian Butler was present in the House of Representatives to hear the historic Statement of Apology.

These elders are national treasures.

As we remember the Stolen Generations we should seize the opportunity to ensure that these men and women who sacrificed so much are enshrined in our national history – lest we forget once again.

Anna Haebich is professor in the School of Arts at Griffith University. She is author of Broken Circles The Fragmentation of Aboriginal Families 1800-2000 and Spinning the Dream Assimilation in Australia 1950 to 1970, both published by Fremantle Press.

Share
 

At last this country has a leader prepared to acknowledge the mistreatment of thousands of Aboriginal people. The apology he delivered on the behalf of the government is a huge step and is long overdue. The damage done to thousands of families can never be completely repaired but the apology is still part of the healing process. Now the country needs to get on with the process of reconciliation.

For hundreds of years Aboriginal people have been treated as inferior beings. Even today, there are many in our society who choose to look down on indigenous Australians. After two centuries of mistreatment, aboriginal people may be downtrodden, but they are not beaten. As members of the oldest surviving culture on the planet, they deserve much more respect.

The introduction to this video gives a little background information and is followed by the apology from the Prime Minister.
Click here to view the Apology

Share
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes
© 2012 What Steven Cousley Does Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha